Assessing U.S. Leadership in Quantum Science and Technology

US-China Technology CompetitionHouse Science, Space, and Technology · January 22, 2026 · 119th Congress
The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee held this hearing to examine federal quantum science and technology programs at NIST, NSF, NASA, and DOE, and to gather input for a bipartisan reauthorization of the National Quantum Initiative Act. Begins at ▶ 0:12:30
Transcript
Highlights

Title

House hearing on assessing US leadership in quantum science and technology

Purpose

The House Science, Space, and Technology Committee held this hearing to examine federal quantum science and technology programs at NIST, NSF, NASA, and DOE, and to gather input for a bipartisan reauthorization of the National Quantum Initiative Act. Witnesses testified on quantum computing, sensing, networking, postquantum cryptography, workforce development, and supply chain challenges amid growing competition with China. Members also raised concerns about federal workforce cuts, tariffs, and immigration policy affecting the quantum talent pipeline. Begins at▶ 0:12:30

Who spoke

• Chairman Brian Babin (R-TX)▶ 0:13:24: Opened by framing quantum as a top Trump administration R&D priority and noted NIST's 2024 postquantum cryptography standards▶ 0:16:10; said his staff and Ranking Member Lofgren's staff are collaborating on a bipartisan NQI reauthorization▶ 0:18:03; later questioned witnesses on postquantum cryptography gaps▶ 1:47:41 and China's lunar quantum efforts▶ 1:48:37.

• Ranking Member Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)▶ 0:18:28: Said China invested more than four times the US in quantum R&D in 2024 and announced a $138 billion tech fund in 2025▶ 0:19:30▶ 0:19:44; warned that agency staffing cuts and cancelled workforce grants undermine quantum leadership▶ 0:20:44▶ 0:22:03; criticized tariffs, citing a company that paid a seven-figure tariff on one piece of European equipment▶ 0:22:50.

• Dr. James Kushmerick, NIST▶ 0:24:58: Said NIST has been a quantum leader for 50+ years with four Nobel Prizes tied to its research▶ 0:25:26; described NIST's 2024 release of three postquantum cryptography standards▶ 0:27:26 and plans for quantum manufacturing accelerators▶ 0:27:45.

• Dr. Saul Gonzalez, NSF▶ 0:29:20: Outlined NSF's three NQI goals—fundamental research, proof-of-concept devices, and workforce building—and five multidisciplinary quantum centers▶ 0:31:47▶ 0:32:16; said NSF-funded QIS faculty/students has nearly doubled since 2018 but supply still lags demand▶ 0:33:15.

• Dr. Mark Clampin, NASA▶ 0:34:21: Traced NASA quantum sensing back to Mariner 4 in 1964▶ 0:34:59 and described the Cold Atom Laboratory on ISS and a planned quantum gravity gradiometer for water/drought mapping▶ 0:37:14▶ 0:37:43; said NASA is not a formal NQI member▶ 2:54:47.

• Dr. Tanner Crowder, DOE▶ 0:38:41: Described DOE's five national QIS research centers and the newly launched Genesis mission and Office of AI and Quantum▶ 0:39:57▶ 1:51:39; said DOE is roughly one to two orders of magnitude away from scientifically useful quantum computation▶ 3:00:07.

• Rep. Charles Fleischmann (R-TN)▶ 1:58:04: Highlighted Chattanooga's commercial quantum network and Oak Ridge's Nvidia NVL72 supercomputer for quantum error correction▶ 1:58:37▶ 2:01:05.

• Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-MI)▶ 2:03:00: Asked about NIST's Manufacturing Extension Partnership addressing quantum supply chains▶ 2:04:11 and touted her Quantum in Practice Act with Rep. Feenstra on quantum modeling and simulation▶ 2:06:38.

• Rep. Vince Fong (R-CA)▶ 2:08:04: Asked about NASA's quantum sensing mission advantages▶ 2:08:04 and pressed all witnesses on overseas sourcing of quantum components and supply chain inventorying efforts▶ 2:09:50▶ 2:10:15.

• Rep. Maxine Dexter (D-OR)▶ 2:13:15: Asked about pairing NSF's Advanced Technology Education program with instrumentation investments▶ 2:13:45 and pressed witnesses on recruiting/retaining diverse quantum talent amid administration cuts▶ 2:14:57.

• Rep. (Dr.) from Georgia [Buddy Carter/Rich McCormick region]▶ 2:18:24: Asked witnesses to define "progress" in quantum▶ 2:18:50 and raised concerns about foreign students—including large numbers from China—learning advanced US quantum research and then leaving▶ 2:20:37.

• Rep. Deborah Ross (D-NC)▶ 2:23:52: Cited NC State's DOE-backed hybrid quantum computing research and Duke's academic quantum computer▶ 2:47:24; asked about NSF partnerships with NC State and Duke▶ 2:48:58.

• Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL)▶ 2:56:10: Highlighted the Chicago Quantum Exchange and Illinois' NSF-funded Quantum Leap Challenge Institutes▶ 2:57:00; asked how agencies place technology bets (e.g., cryogenic vs. other qubit platforms) given risk of stranded investment▶ 2:58:28.

• Rep. Anna Paulina Herodopoulos (R-FL)▶ 3:01:53: Asked about the future of NASA's Cold Atom Laboratory post-ISS decommissioning▶ 3:02:21 and NIST's quantum accelerators' role in promoting US dominance▶ 3:03:44.

• Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA)▶ 3:04:57: Raised concerns about tariffs disrupting the quantum supply chain▶ 3:05:26; asked Crowder about AI/quantum computing risks tied to alignment and artificial superintelligence▶ 3:06:47; asked Gonzalez about quantum encryption for personal data privacy▶ 3:09:11.

• Rep. Sarah McBride (D-DE, "Rep. Delaney" per transcript)▶ 3:10:42: Praised NIST's Maryland presence and Governor Moore's "Capital of Quantum" initiative▶ 3:11:38; asked about onshoring supply chains for lasers and cooling equipment▶ 3:13:07 and deployment timelines for postquantum encryption standards▶ 3:14:48.

• Rep. Andy Barr / other members asking supply-chain and workforce questions (e.g., Rep. from South Carolina)▶ 2:29:37: Raised concerns about multinational quantum companies and pressed all four witnesses on prioritizing 100%-American-owned quantum firms with taxpayer funds▶ 2:30:27.

• Rep. from Utah (Dr. Kennedy)▶ 2:39:51: Asked about national labs' role in the Genesis mission▶ 2:39:55 and China's lead in quantum communications research quality▶ 2:42:37.

• Rep. from Tennessee (Mr. Van Orden/"Vanips")▶ 2:51:05: Asked about the biggest obstacle moving quantum from lab demonstration to Department of War programs of record▶ 2:51:31 and prioritizing quantum applications for grid/critical infrastructure▶ 2:53:56.

Key moments

• Lofgren said the US invested nearly $1 billion in openly published quantum research in 2023, while China invested more than four times the US amount in 2024 and announced a $138 billion tech fund in 2025▶ 0:19:30▶ 0:19:44.

• NIST's Kushmerick said the agency released the first three postquantum cryptography standards in 2024, now being pushed toward international adoption with over 50 industry partners on domestic deployment▶ 1:48:05▶ 0:27:26.

• Clampin said NASA's Mariner 4 flew the first US quantum sensor in 1964, and NASA recently flew the first imaging quantum sensor (a microcalorimeter) on the Chrism X-ray astrophysics mission▶ 0:35:19▶ 0:35:47.

• Crowder said DOE's five national QIS centers have engaged over 1,500 collaborators across 115 universities and trained more than 200 students▶ 2:17:43.

• Rep. Gabe Amo cited a 29% drop in NSF civilian staff and 16% drop at NIST between November 2024 and 2025, plus roughly one-fifth of NASA staff taking deferred resignation/early retirement▶ 2:36:01▶ 2:36:30; all four witnesses agreed foreign-born scientists are important to US quantum leadership▶ 2:37:36.

• A Georgia member pressed Gonzalez on the US training hundreds of thousands of Chinese students in advanced quantum/AI research who then return home; Gonzalez called the research-security tradeoff a policy question "outside my purview," and no witness offered a solution▶ 2:20:37▶ 2:22:09▶ 2:22:39.

• Fong asked whether NASA sources critical quantum components overseas; Clampin said he was not aware of any, noting many NASA quantum sensors are built in-house▶ 2:10:15▶ 2:10:26.

• Crowder said quantum computing is currently one to two orders of magnitude away from scientifically useful calculations, and DOE is working to narrow down qubit platform choices via milestone-based programs▶ 3:00:07▶ 3:00:32.

• Foster raised the risk of "stranded investment" from betting on the wrong cryogenic or hardware architecture at scale; Crowder responded DOE aims to derisk by supporting broad fundamental research before narrowing down platforms▶ 2:59:38▶ 3:01:37.

• Beyer asked Crowder about AI alignment risks tied to quantum-accelerated computing; Crowder said quantum's near-term value is in chemical, material-science, and high-energy-physics simulations rather than superintelligence concerns▶ 3:07:11▶ 3:07:30.

Metadata

CommitteeHouse Science, Space, and Technology
Chamber / CongressHouse · 119th Congress
DateJanuary 22, 2026
TypeHearing
Witnesses
Dr. Tanner Crowder — Quantum Information Science Lead, Office of Science, Department of Energy
Dr. James Kushmerick — Director, Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology
Dr. Mark Clampin — Deputy Associate Administrator, Science Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Dr. Saul Gonzalez — Deputy Directorate Head, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Science Foundation
Videoyoutube
Transcript354 caption blocks · 18,716 words · 3:16:10 runtime
EventCongress.gov 118878